![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> That's true, but at some point in the future I think the work involved > in making sure all new additional kernel code and all new intra-kernel > interactions are "tuned" becomes larger than going preemptive all the > way down. It makes no difference to the kernel the work is the same in all cases because you cannot pre-empt while holding a lock. Therefore you have to do all the lock analysis anyway - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [W:0.514 / U:0.290 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||