![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 2002-01-05 at 22:34, listmail@majere.epithna.com wrote: > How close are you and Robert Love on getting this patch and his pre-emt > patches to co-operate...seems like that might bring huge wins. I know, I > know I could diff, and fix the rejects myself, but this seems to deep in > the kernel for a relative newbie like myself(plus I am more a file system > guy) Unfortunately it looks like it is going to take a bit more than fixing trivial rejects. I started working on it today. I suspect I am going to need a lot better understanding of Ingo's scheduler, so I am learning it. I am traveling tomorrow but should be able to dive into it on Monday. Ingo and I both agree that the patches together are a Good Thing. I have a fully ported patch at this point but it hard locks on boot. I believe the problem to be a few bits in sched.c, but there may be some underlying changes that break assumptions elsewhere. We are working on it. Help is always appreciated, though ;) Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||