lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 6 Jan 2002 23:49:27 +1100
FromAnton Blanchard <>
SubjectO(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results
Hi Ingo,

I got your scheduler rewrite going on ppc64. Here are some initial
LMbench results with sched-O1-2.4.17-B4.patch. Bear in mind the two
machines are different chips (one is Power3 and the other is RS64), so
some differences will result:

2 way (POWER3) summary:
signal handling down a bit (GOOD)
fork down a lot (very GOOD)
exec, sh down (GOOD)
context switches all down (GOOD)
communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD)
pipe bandwidth up (GOOD)

4 way (RS64) summary:
stat up a bit (BAD)
fork down a lot (very GOOD)
exec, sh down (GOOD)
context switches same or down (GOOD)
communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD)
pipe bandwidth up (GOOD)

So far things look good. Next up I'll look at how it scales on the 12
way.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008