![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, george anzinger wrote: > Nathan wrote: > > > > Out of sheer curiosity (and this might be a stupid question), is there > > any effort to make the following lines of development all work together: > > RML's preempt-kernel and lock-break (and netdev, but that doesn't touch > > the other stuff), Rick's rmap VM, and the O(1) scheduler? If so, is it > No, not in concept. Just that they collide in a couple of places and > need a bit of sorting out. Give us a moment. I'm adding low latency reschedule points to page_launder_zone() and refill_inactive_zone() right now ;) regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||