Messages in this thread | | | From | Juan Casero <> | Subject | Re: ReiserFS patch for 2.4.0-test2 | Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:09:46 -0400 |
| |
I tried it yesterday and it seemed rather sluggish when accessing disk files. It might be that the driver is not tuned (can't really speculate) or that my paranoia jumped into overdrive. Either way I moved back to the 2.2.15 kernel and will stay there for a while since this machine is workhorse in the office.
Thanks for the advice.
Juan
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Tony Hoyle wrote: > > > Chris Mason wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Juan Casero wrote: > > > > > > > Hi - > > > > > > > > May I ask if the reiserfs patch for the 2.40-test kernels is useable? I know > > > > the whole spiel about the 2.40-test2 kernels being development kernels but I > > > > find them to be fairly stable for desktop use. I currenty have a Mandrake 7.1 > > > > system with a ReiserFS root partition. I want to run the newer 2.4.0-test > > > > series of kernels because of the improve support for my IDE chipset but I need > > > > to make sure that the patch won't trash my root file system altogether. Please > > > > don't take offense at my question since I know I am wading into deep water here. > > > > > > > > Remember that the reiserfs patches for 2.4.x are only experimental and are unreliable > > according to the readme that comes with them. Also reiserfsck is not finished yet for > > this version (a sore point with me as it has already corrupted a couple of directories...) > > > > Ummm, it isn't supposed to corrupt directories. Could you give some > details on how it happened? > > -chris -- Juan Casero IFX Corporation 15050 NW 79th CT Miami Lakes, FL 33016
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |