Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Mar 2000 20:32:19 -0500 (EST) | From | "Albert D. Cahalan" <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix |
| |
Ingo Molnar writes: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something >> strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there >> should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts. > > 64 on my box.
64 k on an S/390, from the 16-bit channel ID. (not saying I wouldn't like this change on my PC though)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |