Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:50:36 +0000 (GMT) | From | Riley Williams <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix |
| |
Hi Albert.
>>> It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are >>> doing something strange. And it should not be much >>> bigger than it is now -- there should not be much >>> "active but currently not used" interrupts.
>> 64 on my box.
> 64 k on an S/390, from the 16-bit channel ID.
> (not saying I wouldn't like this change on my PC though)
One thing that would help with configuration problems is a file that listed totals from last boot for all interrupts that have actually occurred. I would put that in a separate file though.
Best wishes from Riley.
* Copyright (C) 2000, Memory Alpha Systems. * All rights and wrongs reserved.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux | | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, | | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone | | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ * http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |