Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? | Date | Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:12:49 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS? > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)
EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported MODULE_foo - export specific symbol
none of the above, export all globals but without modvers
The behaviour may have changed with newer modutils, its originally there for compatibility in the earlier days of the module stuff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |