Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:45:00 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? |
| |
Rogier Wolff wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and > > > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS? > > > > > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :) > > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported > > MODULE_foo - export specific symbol > > > > none of the above, export all globals but without modvers > ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!! > > I consider that a bug, but...
eh? Can you give an example of this? This should definitely -not- be the case.
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |