Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? | Date | Sat, 18 Nov 2000 18:40:07 +0100 (MET) | From | (Rogier Wolff) |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and > > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS? > > > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :) > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported > MODULE_foo - export specific symbol > > none of the above, export all globals but without modvers ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!!
I consider that a bug, but...
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |