Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Sep 1999 01:33:44 +0200 (MET_DST) | From | David Weinehall <> | Subject | config-menus |
| |
I've undertaken quite a task; I'm rewriting all the config-menus at the moment (for all platforms) to make them more uniform (same indentation everywhere, etc.)
A few things that I've added, that I want comments on:
o A "Code maturity"-menu for PPC, as it was the only port without this menu
o A "Prompt for drivers/code flagged DANGEROUS" option in the code-maturity section that is conditional depending on EXPERIMENTAL
o (EXPERIMENTAL) has been added to all drivers inside CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL if's, and CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL if's has been added where missing
o All drivers/code saying DANGEROUS has been changed from CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to CONFIG_DANGEROUS
o Some smaller fixes has been made (for instance, there was two occurences of "Frame-buffer support" in the MIPS-port
o I've indented all the config-files in a uniform way
I've of course also included the other patches I did earlier in the same direction.
Now, my main question is:
"Is this something I'm going to hate myself forever for doing -- something that noone will accept, or is it something that could actually be accepted into the kernel mainstream?"
My patches are against v2.3.17, if anyone wonders.
/David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |