Messages in this thread | | | From | thomasz@hostmast ... | Date | Wed, 26 May 1999 11:36:26 +0200 | Subject | Re: XFS and journalling filesystems |
| |
> You should be aware that the whole development model of Linux (and > open-source programs in general) is that someone gets pissed at the bad > availability or implementation of something, and goes ahead and writes > something better. In light of that, why would anyone ever think ext3 (or > whatever is in the works from other sides of the world) would be But since ext3 shall incorporate many of the features available in XFS, I vote to adopt XFS if it is released under a suitable license.
> discontinued just because SGI contributes something ? Would all filesystem > development in the world stop if MS contributed a R/W NTFS implementation > ? Off course not, most vendors do not intentionally screw up a superior OS.
Thomas
The release of Windows 2000 has been delayed until Q2/1901. ------------------------------------------------- T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 ) PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89 mail pgp-key-request@hostmaster.org ------------------------------------------------- [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |