Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:05:32 -0500 (EST) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: Linux Kernel constraints! |
| |
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, brent verner wrote:
> hey, let's be serious here. > Linux works...and works...and works...ad infinitum(?)
Yes. I will make 3 statements about some the things wrong with Linux.
(1) The pyrosynchrogem is not compliant with the confuser. This makes NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.
(2) The orksafagen distiller lacks treble ranges. This makes NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.
(3) The modicum refuser is not reenterable. This makes NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.
There are 3 more problems:
(1) Linux doesn't have a pyrosynchrogem. (2) Linux doesn't have an orksafagen distiller. (3) Linux doesn't have a modicum refuser.
But NT does! Of course you'll have to take my word for it because you can't see the source-code.
Cheers, Dick Johnson ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** Penguin : Linux version 2.1.131 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips). Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology. Wisdom : It's not a Y2K problem. It's a Y2Day problem.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |