lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux Kernel constraints!
Date
Followup to:  <F1C298E6C941D111A18500805F89245932C188@MIDCBDC>
By author: Yogesh Bansal <yogesh.bansal@tatainfotech.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Recently(dec.) in WindowsNT magazine comparisons/similarities between
> various flavours of unix and nt had come. In the same article Linux was
> ignored as enterprise os on account of following kernel 'limitations' :
>
> 1. kernel is not preemptive. ie even a higher priority user thread cant
> cause another thread to be swapped if the other thread is presently running
> in privileged/kernel context.
> 2. kernel is not reentrant. ie.only one thread in kernel context at a time.
> 3. kernel is not multi processing in the sense that on multiprocessor
> systems it will run on only one cpu at a time.
>
> will somebody can clarify these doubts and version which enabled it to be
> otherwise.
> yogi
>

2 and 3 are just plain incorrect, although the granularity could be
improved. 1 is true, but is not a major problem in practice, except
for hard real time. As an "enterprise OS" hard real time is hardly a
requirement.

Sounds like standard WindowsNT mag. FUD to me (this mag seems to be a
major source of FUD these days.)

-hpa
--
PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
"To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.123 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site