Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:36:50 +0100 (CET) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13 |
| |
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Steve Bergman wrote:
> Here are updated results including arcavm16: > > > 116 Image test in 128MB: > > pre6+zlatko's_patch 2:35 > and with requested change 3:09 > pre6 2:27 > pre5 1:58 > arcavm13 9:13 > arcavm15 1:59 > pre-7 2:41 > arcavm16 1:54
Cool, now that arcavm16 (in pre6) is faster than pre5 I am courious to see what will happens with the one liner patch below applyed on the top of arcavm16 (maybe nothing but... ;). We can call the resulting code arcavm17 against pre6 (that pratically insteaed is arcavm16 applyed on pre5 ;).
Index: linux/mm/page_alloc.c diff -u linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1.1.1.7 linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1.1.1.1.2.27 --- linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1.1.1.7 Sat Jan 9 12:58:25 1999 +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c Mon Jan 11 19:57:07 1999 @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ { int freed; current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC; - freed = try_to_free_pages(gfp_mask, freepages.high - nr_free_pages); + freed = try_to_free_pages(gfp_mask, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC; if (!freed && !(gfp_mask & (__GFP_MED | __GFP_HIGH))) goto nopage;
Andrea Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |