[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13
Andrea Arcangeli <> writes:

> I've seen pre7 now and I produced arca-vm-18 against it.
> In arca-vm-18 I avoided the swaping readahead if we would be forced to do
> _sync_ IO in the readahead. This make tons of sense to me.

Yes, I agree. I made a same change in my development patches, this
morning, and it works well. We can only gain with policy like that.

> Another thing that would be interesting could be to change
> SWAPFILE_CLUSTER to 256 as in clean pre7. I think it's not needed because
> I am not hearing disk seeks under heavy swapping but may I guess there is
> some reason is 256 in pre7 ;)?

Better clustering of pages on the disk. That will improve swapin
readahead hit rate, and overall performance.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.131 / U:1.856 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site