Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:39:52 +0400 | From | Kirill Korotaev <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul |
| |
>>>> pzone based memory controller: >>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=113867467006531&w=2 >>> From a super-quick scan that looks saner. Is it effective? Is this the >>> way you're planning on proceeding? >> Yes, it is effective, and the reclamation is O(1) too. It has couple of >> problems by design, (1) doesn't handle shared pages and (2) doesn't >> provide support for both min_shares and max_shares. > > Right. I wanted to show proof-of-cencept of the pzone based controller > and implemented minimal features necessary as the memory controller. > So, the pzone based controller still needs development and some cleanup. Just out of curiosity, how it was meassured that it is effective? How does it work when there is a global memory shortage in the system?
Thanks, Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |