Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:10:53 +0900 | From | KUROSAWA Takahiro <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul |
| |
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:28:45 -0700 Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > pzone based memory controller: > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=113867467006531&w=2 > > > > From a super-quick scan that looks saner. Is it effective? Is this the > > way you're planning on proceeding? > > Yes, it is effective, and the reclamation is O(1) too. It has couple of > problems by design, (1) doesn't handle shared pages and (2) doesn't > provide support for both min_shares and max_shares.
Right. I wanted to show proof-of-cencept of the pzone based controller and implemented minimal features necessary as the memory controller. So, the pzone based controller still needs development and some cleanup. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |