lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add se-fw binding doc
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:37:22AM +0000, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > On 12/07/2023 20:26, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:42:13PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:

> > >> + value, i.e., supported SoC(s) are imx8ulp, imx93.

> > >> +
> > >> +properties:
> > >> + compatible:
> > >> + enum:
> > >> + - fsl,imx-ele
> > >
> > > This looks like a generic compatible, not a specific one, but you use
> > > it on the imx8ulp. I would have expected that you would have something
> > > like "fsl,imx8ulp-ele" for that.
> >
> > Yeah, this one looks generic, so not what we expect.
>
> This change left un-changed in V4. It is "fsl,se-fw", instead of "fsl,imx8ulp-ele".
> I will change in V5.

That's a generic compatible too, so no different to "fsl,imx-ele".
What is the reason for avoiding the SoC-specific "fsl,imx8ulp-ele"?

> > >> + - fsl,imx93-ele

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-24 08:49    [W:0.052 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site