Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:53:12 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall | From | Shuah Khan <> |
| |
On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@suse.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >> >>> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has >>> style problems, please review. >>> >>> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >>> >>> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script >>> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your >>> output? >>> >>> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's >>> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset. >>> >> >> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on >> whether or not you would need a module name for this module? > > I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In > this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There > is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please? >
I see that now.
thanks, -- Shuah
| |