lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] x86/percpu: Use C for percpu read/write accessors
Date


> On Oct 9, 2023, at 3:00 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> !! External Email
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 1:51 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> BTW., while this OK for testing, this is too heavy handed for release
>> purposes, so please only disable the KASAN instrumentation for the affected
>> percpu accessors.
>>
>> See the various __no_sanitize* attributes available.
>
> These attributes are for function declarations. The percpu casts can
> not be implemented with separate static inline functions. Also,
> __no_sanitize_address is mutually exclusive with __always_inline.

Right, but for GCC you may be able to do something like:

#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fsanitize=address"

// Your code here...
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop

Not sure if there is something equivalent in CLANG, and it should be done with
the kernel’s _Pragma.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-10-09 14:34    [W:1.128 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site