lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v6 00/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes
Date
Hi James,

> Changes in this version?
> * Changed supports_mba_mbps() to use is_mbm_local_enabled()
>
> ---
> The aim of this series is to insert a split between the parts of the monitor code
> that the architecture must implement, and those that are part of the resctrl
> filesystem. The eventual aim is to move all filesystem parts out to live in
> /fs/resctrl, so that resctrl can be wired up for MPAM.
>
> What's MPAM? See the cover letter of a previous series. [1]
>
> The series adds domain online/offline callbacks to allow the filesystem to
> manage some of its structures itself, then moves all the 'mba_sc' behaviour to
> be part of the filesystem.
> This means another architecture doesn't need to provide an mbps_val array.
> As its all software, the resctrl filesystem should be able to do this without any
> help from the architecture code.
>
> Finally __rmid_read() is refactored to be the API call that the architecture
> provides to read a counter value. All the hardware specific overflow detection,
> scaling and value correction should occur behind this helper.
>
>
> This series is based on v6.0-rc3, and can be retrieved from:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git
> mpam/resctrl_monitors_in_bytes/v6
>
> [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git
> mpam/resctrl_merge_cdp/v7 [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210728170637.25610-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
>
> Previous versions of this series:
> [v1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> [v2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211001160302.31189-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> [v3]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220217182110.7176-1-james.morse@arm.com/
> [v4]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220412124419.30689-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> [v5]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622164629.20795-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
>
> James Morse (21):
> x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled
> x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled
> x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work
> x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup
> x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work
> x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation
> x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps()
> x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain
> x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list
> x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val
> x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly
> x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count()
> chunks
> x86/resctrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks
> x86/resctrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset
> x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read()
> x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into
> resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
> x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() into resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
> x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() into
> resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
> x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold
> x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's
> boot_cpu_data
> x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h | 9 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 117 ++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 75 ++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 61 +++---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 232
> ++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 216
> ++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 64 +++++-
> 8 files changed, 514 insertions(+), 262 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.2
I tested this patch series(patch v6) on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6254 CPU with resctrl selftest.
It is no problem.

Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-13 03:01    [W:0.201 / U:2.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site