Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Sep 2022 18:00:44 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work | From | James Morse <> |
| |
Hi Hao Xin,
On 07/09/2022 07:29, haoxin wrote: > 在 2022/9/2 下午11:48, James Morse 写道: >> Because domains are exposed to user-space via resctrl, the filesystem >> must update its state when CPU hotplug callbacks are triggered. >> >> Some of this work is common to any architecture that would support >> resctrl, but the work is tied up with the architecture code to >> free the memory. >> >> Move the monitor subdir removal and the cancelling of the mbm/limbo >> works into a new resctrl_offline_domain() call. These bits are not >> specific to the architecture. Grouping them in one function allows >> that code to be moved to /fs/ and re-used by another architecture.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c >> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c >> index 030a70326ccc..5830905a92d2 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c >> @@ -3233,6 +3231,45 @@ static int __init rdtgroup_setup_root(void) >> return ret; >> } >> +static void domain_destroy_mon_state(struct rdt_domain *d)
> add inline ?
As previously, the compiler doesn't need to be told it can inline static functions in a C file.
Thanks,
James
| |