lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] wil6210: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Date
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c
index ed4df561e5c5..f521af575e9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pm.c
@@ -445,10 +445,9 @@ int wil_pm_runtime_get(struct wil6210_priv *wil)
int rc;
struct device *dev = wil_to_dev(wil);

- rc = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+ rc = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
if (rc < 0) {
- wil_err(wil, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed, rc = %d\n", rc);
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ wil_err(wil, "pm_runtime_resume_and_get() failed, rc = %d\n", rc);
return rc;
}

--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-11 03:37    [W:2.078 / U:1.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site