lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
Subject[PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track only for... page tracking
From
Don't bounce through the page-track notifier when zapping+flushing SPTEs
in response to memslot changes as the need to zap+flush isn't strictly
limited to page-tracking. With that done, register KVM's notifier on the
first allocation of a shadow root, as KVM's ->track_write() hook is used
only to react to writes to gPTEs.

Aside from avoiding a RETPOLINE on emulated writes, dropping KVM's internal
use will allow removing ->track_flush_slot() altogether once KVM-GT moves
to a different hook[*]. Tracking "flushes" of slots is a poor fit for
KVM-GT's needs as KVM-GT needs to drop its write-protection only when a
memslot change is guaranteed to be committed, whereas the "flush" call is
speculative in the sense that KVM may abort a memslot update after flushing
the original memslot.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221108084416.11447-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com

Sean Christopherson (2):
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot
change
KVM: x86/mmu: Register page-tracker on first shadow root allocation

arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)


base-commit: d663b8a285986072428a6a145e5994bc275df994
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-10 02:49    [W:0.082 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site