lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
From
On 10/4/22 02:35, John Hubbard wrote:
> It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL`
> or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of
> ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made
> significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it".
>

Hmm, seems like neither CALL nor ``CALL`` is better, right?

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-04 04:15    [W:0.361 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site