Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Oct 2022 12:39:00 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description | From | Dave Hansen <> |
| |
On 10/3/22 12:35, John Hubbard wrote: > It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL` > or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of > ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made > significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it".
I'm definitely in this camp as well. Unless the markup *really* adds to readability, just leave it alone.
| |