lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
    From
    On 10/3/22 12:35, John Hubbard wrote:
    > It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL`
    > or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of
    > ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made
    > significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it".

    I'm definitely in this camp as well. Unless the markup *really* adds to
    readability, just leave it alone.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-10-03 21:39    [W:4.232 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site