lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/16] iio: adc: max1027: Separate the IRQ handler from the read logic
Hi Nuno,

"Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@analog.com> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2021 07:23:33
+0000:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:12 PM
> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> > <lars@metafoo.de>
> > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>; linux-
> > iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Miquel Raynal
> > <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 11/16] iio: adc: max1027: Separate the IRQ handler
> > from the read logic
> >
> > [External]
> >
> > Create a max1027_read_scan() helper which will make clearer the
> > future IRQ
> > handler updates (no functional change).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > index 83526f3d7d3a..afc3ce69f7ea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> > @@ -427,19 +427,18 @@ static int
> > max1027_set_cnvst_trigger_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private)
> > +static int max1027_read_scan(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > {
> > - struct iio_poll_func *pf = private;
> > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > unsigned int scanned_chans = fls(*indio_dev-
> > >active_scan_mask);
> > u16 *buf = st->buffer;
> > unsigned int bit;
> > -
> > - pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq,
> > private);
> > + int ret;
> >
> > /* fill buffer with all channel */
> > - spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, scanned_chans * 2);
> > + ret = spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, scanned_chans * 2);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > /* Only keep the channels selected by the user */
> > for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > @@ -451,6 +450,22 @@ static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int
> > irq, void *private)
> >
> > iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, st->buffer);
> >
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_poll_func *pf = private;
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq,
> > private);
> > +
>
> This should be more consistent... use 'dev_err()'. I would also
> argue to use the spi dev as the driver state structure holds a
> pointer to it...

I honestly don't see the point of these debug messages (there is
another useless pr_debug in probe). I kept it here as I am just moving
code around without any changes, but if you don't like it (me neither)
I'll add a simple patch dropping them.

Thanks,
Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-02 10:56    [W:0.110 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site