lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 11/16] iio: adc: max1027: Separate the IRQ handler from the read logic
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:12 PM
> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> <lars@metafoo.de>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>; linux-
> iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 11/16] iio: adc: max1027: Separate the IRQ handler
> from the read logic
>
> [External]
>
> Create a max1027_read_scan() helper which will make clearer the
> future IRQ
> handler updates (no functional change).
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> index 83526f3d7d3a..afc3ce69f7ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> @@ -427,19 +427,18 @@ static int
> max1027_set_cnvst_trigger_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private)
> +static int max1027_read_scan(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - struct iio_poll_func *pf = private;
> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> unsigned int scanned_chans = fls(*indio_dev-
> >active_scan_mask);
> u16 *buf = st->buffer;
> unsigned int bit;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq,
> private);
> + int ret;
>
> /* fill buffer with all channel */
> - spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, scanned_chans * 2);
> + ret = spi_read(st->spi, st->buffer, scanned_chans * 2);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> /* Only keep the channels selected by the user */
> for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> @@ -451,6 +450,22 @@ static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int
> irq, void *private)
>
> iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, st->buffer);
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> + struct iio_poll_func *pf = private;
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq,
> private);
> +

This should be more consistent... use 'dev_err()'. I would also
argue to use the spi dev as the driver state structure holds a
pointer to it...

- Nuno Sá

> + ret = max1027_read_scan(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
> + "Cannot read scanned values (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> --
> 2.27.0

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-20 09:24    [W:0.469 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site