lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the irqchip tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:

kernel/irq/chip.c

between commit:

56707bb845f5 ("genirq, irq-gic-v3: Make NMI flow handlers use ->irq_ack() if available")

from the irqchip tree and commit:

ef62bf7e92d8 ("irq: abstract irqaction handler invocation")

from the rcu tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc kernel/irq/chip.c
index 1b1171113437,804c2791315d..000000000000
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@@ -768,11 -744,6 +768,9 @@@ void handle_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc

__kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);

+ if (chip->irq_ack)
+ chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
+
- trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
/*
* NMIs cannot be shared, there is only one action.
*/
@@@ -1050,13 -954,7 +1044,10 @@@ void handle_percpu_devid_nmi(struct irq

__kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);

+ if (chip->irq_ack)
+ chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
+
- trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
- res = action->handler(irq, raw_cpu_ptr(action->percpu_dev_id));
- trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
+ handle_irqaction_percpu_devid(irq, action);

if (chip->irq_eoi)
chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-13 06:05    [W:0.044 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site