Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Wang Hai <> | Subject | [PATCH net-next] atm: Use list_for_each_entry() to simplify code in resources.c | Date | Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:03:55 +0800 |
| |
Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() where applicable. This simplifies the code.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> --- net/atm/resources.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/atm/resources.c b/net/atm/resources.c index 53236986dfe0..2b2d33eeaf20 100644 --- a/net/atm/resources.c +++ b/net/atm/resources.c @@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ static struct atm_dev *__alloc_atm_dev(const char *type) static struct atm_dev *__atm_dev_lookup(int number) { struct atm_dev *dev; - struct list_head *p; - list_for_each(p, &atm_devs) { - dev = list_entry(p, struct atm_dev, dev_list); + list_for_each_entry(dev, &atm_devs, dev_list) { if (dev->number == number) { atm_dev_hold(dev); return dev; @@ -215,8 +213,7 @@ int atm_getnames(void __user *buf, int __user *iobuf_len) return -ENOMEM; } tmp_p = tmp_buf; - list_for_each(p, &atm_devs) { - dev = list_entry(p, struct atm_dev, dev_list); + list_for_each_entry(dev, &atm_devs, dev_list) { *tmp_p++ = dev->number; } mutex_unlock(&atm_dev_mutex); -- 2.17.1
| |