lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: mx25l51245g, mx66l51235l and mx66l51235f
Date
mx25l51245g and mx66l51235l have the same flash ID. The flash
detection returns the first entry in the flash_info array that
matches the flash ID that was read, thus for the 0xc2201a ID,
mx25l51245g was always hit, introducing a regression for
mx66l51235l. Revert mx25l51245g addition. A solution for these
flashes to coexist was proposed.

According to macronix website, there is no mx66l51235l part number.
Rename the part to mx66l51235f.

The difference betwenn mx25l51245g and mx66l51235f flash_info entries
was that mx25l51245g also set SECT_4K. Both flashes support 4K erases,
but the 4K erase should be discovered when parsing BFPT, so there's
no need to set the explicit SECT_4K flag.

Tudor Ambarus (2):
Revert "mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add support for mx25l51245g"
mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Fix name for mx66l51235f

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.25.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-02 10:22    [W:0.065 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site