lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
Subject[PATCH v5 0/2] kunit: fail tests on UBSAN errors
From
v1 by Uriel is here: [1].
Since it's been a while, I've dropped the Reviewed-By's.

It depended on commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") which
hadn't been merged yet, so that caused some kerfuffle with applying them
previously and the series was reverted.

This revives the series but makes the kunit_fail_current_test() function
take a format string and logs the file and line number of the failing
code, addressing Alan Maguire's comments on the previous version.

As a result, the patch that makes UBSAN errors was tweaked slightly to
include an error message.

v2 -> v3:
Try and fail to make kunit_fail_current_test() work on CONFIG_KUNIT=m
s/_/__ on the helper func to match others in test.c
v3 -> v4:
Revert to only enabling kunit_fail_current_test() for CONFIG_KUNIT=y
v4 -> v5:
Delete blank line to make checkpatch.pl --strict happy

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200806174326.3577537-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com/

Uriel Guajardo (2):
kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools
kunit: ubsan integration

include/kunit/test-bug.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/kunit/test.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
lib/ubsan.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/kunit/test-bug.h


base-commit: 1678e493d530e7977cce34e59a86bb86f3c5631e
--
2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-04-02 23:22    [W:0.329 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site