lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to enable Guest PEBS via DS
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, Xu, Like wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Thanks for your comments !
>
> On 2021/1/15 3:10, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021, Like Xu wrote:
> > > 2) Slow path (part 3, patch 0012-0017)
> > >
> > > This is when the host assigned physical PMC has a different index
> > > from the virtual PMC (e.g. using physical PMC1 to emulate virtual PMC0)
> > > In this case, KVM needs to rewrite the PEBS records to change the
> > > applicable counter indexes to the virtual PMC indexes, which would
> > > otherwise contain the physical counter index written by PEBS facility,
> > > and switch the counter reset values to the offset corresponding to
> > > the physical counter indexes in the DS data structure.
> > >
> > > Large PEBS needs to be disabled by KVM rewriting the
> > > pebs_interrupt_threshold filed in DS to only one record in
> > > the slow path. This is because a guest may implicitly drain PEBS buffer,
> > > e.g., context switch. KVM doesn't get a chance to update the PEBS buffer.
> > Are the PEBS record write, PEBS index update, and subsequent PMI atomic with
> > respect to instruction execution? If not, doesn't this approach still leave a
> > window where the guest could see the wrong counter?
>
> First, KVM would limit/rewrite guest DS pebs_interrupt_threshold to one
> record before vm-entry,
> (see patch [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: vmx/pmu: Limit pebs_interrupt_threshold in
> the guest DS area)
> which means once a PEBS record is written into the guest pebs buffer,
> a PEBS PMI will be generated immediately and thus vm-exit.

I'm asking about ucode/hardare. Is the "guest pebs buffer write -> PEBS PMI"
guaranteed to be atomic?

In practice, under what scenarios will guest counters get cross-mapped? And,
how does this support affect guest accuracy? I.e. how bad do things get for the
guest if we simply disable guest counters if they can't have a 1:1 association
with their physical counter?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-15 19:01    [W:0.092 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site