[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
Naresh Kamboju writes:
>On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 20:33, Michal Hocko <> wrote:
>> On Fri 22-05-20 02:23:09, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> > My apology !
>> > As per the test results history this problem started happening from
>> > Bad : next-20200430 (still reproducible on next-20200519)
>> > Good : next-20200429
>> >
>> > The git tree / tag used for testing is from linux next-20200430 tag and reverted
>> > following three patches and oom-killer problem fixed.
>> >
>> > Revert "mm, memcg: avoid stale protection values when cgroup is above
>> > protection"
>> > Revert "mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from protectinn checks"
>> > Revert "mm-memcg-decouple-elowmin-state-mutations-from-protection-checks-fix"
>> The discussion has fragmented and I got lost TBH.
>> In
>> you have said that none of the added tracing output has triggered. Does
>> this still hold? Because I still have a hard time to understand how
>> those three patches could have the observed effects.
>On the other email thread [1] this issue is concluded.
>Yafang wrote on May 22 2020,
>Regarding the root cause, my guess is it makes a similar mistake that
>I tried to fix in the previous patch that the direct reclaimer read a
>stale protection value. But I don't think it is worth to add another
>fix. The best way is to revert this commit.

This isn't a conclusion, just a guess (and one I think is unlikely). For this
to reliably happen, it implies that the same race happens the same way each

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-28 18:43    [W:0.083 / U:3.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site