Messages in this thread | | | From | Dietmar Eggemann <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/4] Capacity awareness for SCHED_DEADLINE | Date | Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:50:08 +0200 |
| |
The SCHED_DEADLINE (DL) admission control does not work correctly on heterogeneous (asymmetric CPU capacity) systems such as Arm big.LITTLE or DynamIQ.
Let's fix this by explicitly considering CPU capacity in DL admission control and task migration.
The DL sched class now attempts to avoid missing task deadlines due to smaller CPU (CPU capacity < 1024) not being capable enough to finish a task in time. It does so by trying to place a task so that its CPU capacity scaled deadline is not smaller than its runtime.
Changes RFC [1] -> v1:
Only use static values for CPU bandwidth (sched_dl_entity::dl_runtime, ::dl_deadline) and CPU capacity (arch_scale_cpu_capacity()) to fix DL admission control.
Dynamic values for CPU bandwidth (sched_dl_entity::runtime, ::deadline) and CPU capacity (capacity_of()) are considered to be more related to energy trade-off calculations which could be later introduced using the Energy Model.
Since the design of the DL and RT sched classes are very similar, the implementation follows the overall design of RT capacity awareness (commit 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware")).
Per-patch changes:
(1) Store CPU capacity sum in the root domain during build_sched_domains() [patch 1/4]
(2) Adjust to RT capacity awareness design [patch 3/4]
(3) Remove CPU capacity aware placement in switched_to_dl() (dl_migrate callback) [RFC patch 3/6]
Balance callbacks (push, pull) run only in schedule_tail() __schedule(), rt_mutex_setprio() or __sched_setscheduler(). DL throttling leads to a call to __dequeue_task_dl() which is not a full task dequeue. The task is still enqueued and only removed from the rq. So a queue_balance_callback() call in update_curr_dl()-> __dequeue_task_dl() will not be followed by a balance_callback() call in one of the 4 functions mentioned above.
(4) Remove 'dynamic CPU bandwidth' consideration and only support 'static CPU bandwidth' (ratio between sched_dl_entity::dl_runtime and ::dl_deadline) [RFC patch 4/6]
(5) Remove modification to migration logic which tried to schedule small tasks on LITTLE CPUs [RFC patch 6/6]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190506044836.2914-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it
The following rt-app testcase tailored to Arm64 Hikey960:
root@h960:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity 462 462 462 462 1024 1024 1024 1024
shows the expected behavior.
According to the following condition in dl_task_fits_capacity()
cap_scale(dl_deadline, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu)) >= dl_runtime
thread0-[0-3] are placed on a big CPUs whereas thread1-[0-3] run on a LITTLE CPU respectively.
... "tasks" : { "thread0" : { "policy" : "SCHED_DEADLINE", "instance" : 4, "timer" : { "ref" : "unique0", "period" : 16000, "mode" : "absolute" }, "run" : 10000, "dl-runtime" : 11000, "dl-period" : 16000, "dl-deadline" : 16000 }, "thread1" : { "policy" : "SCHED_DEADLINE", "instance" : 4, "delay" : 1000, "timer" : { "ref" : "unique1", "period" : 16000, "mode" : "absolute" }, "run" : 5500, "dl-runtime" : 6500 "dl-period" : 16000, "dl-deadline" : 16000 } ...
Tests were run with Performance CPUfreq governor so that the Schedutil CPUfreq governor DL threads (sugov:[0,4]), necessary on a slow-switching platform like Hikey960, do not interfere with the rt-app test tasks. Using Schedutil would require to lower the number of tasks to 3 instances each.
Dietmar Eggemann (1): sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum
Luca Abeni (3): sched/deadline: Improve admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities sched/deadline: Make DL capacity-aware sched/deadline: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sched/deadline.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- kernel/sched/sched.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- kernel/sched/topology.c | 14 +++++++++---- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
-- 2.17.1
| |