Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | [PATCH] genirq: Clarify that irq wake state is orthogonal to enable/disable | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2020 22:09:53 -0800 |
| |
There's some confusion around if an irq that's disabled with disable_irq() can still wake the system from sleep states such as "suspend to RAM". Let's clarify this in the kernel documentation for irq_set_irq_wake() so that it's clear that an irq can be disabled and still wake the system if it has been marked for wakeup.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org> Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> --- kernel/irq/manage.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 818b2802d3e7..fa8db98c8699 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -731,6 +731,11 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on) * * Wakeup mode lets this IRQ wake the system from sleep * states like "suspend to RAM". + * + * Note: irq enable/disable state is completely orthogonal + * to the enable/disable state of irq wake. An irq can be + * disabled with disable_irq() and still wake the system as + * long as the irq has wake enabled. */ int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on) { -- Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet
| |