lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume
From
Date
From b74a74f953f4c34818a58831b6eb468b42b17c62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:26:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume

After S3 suspend/resume, "perf stat -I 1000 -e power/energy-pkg/ -a"
reports an insane value for the very first sampling period after resume
as shown below.

    19.278989977               2.16 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    20.279373569               1.96 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    21.279765481               2.09 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    22.280305420               2.10 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    25.504782277   4,294,966,686.01 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    26.505114993               3.58 Joules power/energy-pkg/
    27.505471758               1.66 Joules power/energy-pkg/

Fix this by resetting the counter right after resume.

Kan, Liang proposed the prototype patch and I reworked it to use syscore
ops.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 26c03f5..6cff8fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
 #include <asm/intel-family.h>
 #include "../perf_event.h"
@@ -228,6 +229,32 @@ static u64 rapl_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
  return new_raw_count;
 }
 
+static void rapl_pmu_update_all(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ struct perf_event *event;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry)
+ rapl_event_update(event);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void rapl_pmu_restart_all(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ struct perf_event *event;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry)
+ local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, rapl_read_counter(event));
+
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+}
+
 static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
 {
        hrtimer_start(&pmu->hrtimer, pmu->timer_interval,
@@ -237,18 +264,11 @@ static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
 static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 {
  struct rapl_pmu *pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
- struct perf_event *event;
- unsigned long flags;
 
  if (!pmu->n_active)
  return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
-
- list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry)
- rapl_event_update(event);
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ rapl_pmu_update_all(pmu);
 
  hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, pmu->timer_interval);
 
@@ -698,6 +718,52 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
  return 0;
 }
 
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+
+static int perf_rapl_suspend(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+ for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
+ rapl_pmu_update_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
+ put_online_cpus();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void perf_rapl_resume(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+ for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
+ rapl_pmu_restart_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
+ put_online_cpus();
+}
+
+static struct syscore_ops perf_rapl_syscore_ops = {
+ .resume = perf_rapl_resume,
+ .suspend = perf_rapl_suspend,
+};
+
+static void perf_rapl_pm_register(void)
+{
+ register_syscore_ops(&perf_rapl_syscore_ops);
+}
+
+static void perf_rapl_pm_unregister(void)
+{
+ unregister_syscore_ops(&perf_rapl_syscore_ops);
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline void perf_rapl_pm_register(void) { }
+static inline void perf_rapl_pm_unregister(void) { }
+
+#endif
+
 #define X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(model, init) \
  { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long)&init }
 
@@ -798,6 +864,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
  apply_quirk = rapl_init->apply_quirk;
  rapl_cntr_mask = rapl_init->cntr_mask;
  rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_init->attrs;
+ perf_rapl_pm_register();
 
  ret = rapl_check_hw_unit(apply_quirk);
  if (ret)
@@ -836,6 +903,7 @@ static void __exit intel_rapl_exit(void)
 {
  cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_RAPL_ONLINE);
  perf_pmu_unregister(&rapl_pmus->pmu);
+ perf_rapl_pm_unregister();
  cleanup_rapl_pmus();
 }
 module_exit(intel_rapl_exit);
-- 
2.7.4

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-17 15:42    [W:0.059 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site