[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] clk: rockchip: undo several noc and special clocks as critical on rk3288

在 2019/4/22 下午11:23, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Elaine,
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:18 AM Douglas Anderson <> wrote:
>> This is mostly a revert of commit 55bb6a633c33 ("clk: rockchip: mark
>> noc and some special clk as critical on rk3288") except that we're
>> keeping "pmu_hclk_otg0" as critical still.
>> NOTE: turning these clocks off doesn't seem to do a whole lot in terms
>> of power savings (checking the power on the logic rail). It appears
>> to save maybe 1-2mW. ...but still it seems like we should turn the
>> clocks off if they aren't needed.
>> About "pmu_hclk_otg0" (the one clock from the original commit we're
>> still keeping critical) from an email thread:
>>> pmu ahb clock
>>> Function: Clock to pmu module when hibernation and/or ADP is
>>> enabled. Must be greater than or equal to 30 MHz.
>>> If the SOC design does not support hibernation/ADP function, only have
>>> hclk_otg, this clk can be switched according to the usage of otg.
>>> If the SOC design support hibernation/ADP, has two clocks, hclk_otg and
>>> pmu_hclk_otg0.
>>> Hclk_otg belongs to the closed part of otg logic, which can be switched
>>> according to the use of otg.
>>> pmu_hclk_otg0 belongs to the always on part.
>>> As for whether pmu_hclk_otg0 can be turned off when otg is not in use,
>>> we have not tested. IC suggest make pmu_hclk_otg0 always on.
>> For the rest of the clocks:
>> atclk: No documentation about this clock other than that it goes to
>> the CPU. CPU functions fine without it on. Maybe needed for JTAG?
>> jtag: Presumably this clock is only needed if you're debugging with
>> JTAG. It doesn't seem like it makes sense to waste power for every
>> rk3288 user. In any case to do JTAG you'd need private patches to
>> adjust the pinctrl the mux the JTAG out anyway.
>> pclk_dbg, pclk_core_niu: On veyron Chromebooks we turn these two
>> clocks on only during kernel panics in order to access some coresight
>> registers. Since nothing in the upstream kernel does this we should
>> be able to leave them off safely. Maybe also needed for JTAG?
>> hsicphy12m_xin12m: There is no indication of why this clock would need
>> to be turned on for boards that don't use HSIC.
>> pclk_ddrupctl[0-1], pclk_publ0[0-1]: On veyron Chromebooks we turn
>> these 4 clocks on only when doing DDR transitions and they are off
>> otherwise. I see no reason why they'd need to be on in the upstream
>> kernel which doesn't support DDRFreq.
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Now keep pmu_hclk_otg0 as critical.
>> - Updated description since this isn't a clean revert.
>> - PWM patches have landed, so just one patch in the series now.
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 13 ++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >From previous discussions I think you're all happy with this patch
> now, right? Care to give it an official Reviewed-by tag?


Reviewed-by: Elaine Zhang <>

> -Doug

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-23 03:16    [W:0.077 / U:7.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site