[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] clk: rockchip: undo several noc and special clocks as critical on rk3288
Am Freitag, 12. April 2019, 18:17:47 CEST schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> This is mostly a revert of commit 55bb6a633c33 ("clk: rockchip: mark
> noc and some special clk as critical on rk3288") except that we're
> keeping "pmu_hclk_otg0" as critical still.
> NOTE: turning these clocks off doesn't seem to do a whole lot in terms
> of power savings (checking the power on the logic rail). It appears
> to save maybe 1-2mW. ...but still it seems like we should turn the
> clocks off if they aren't needed.
> About "pmu_hclk_otg0" (the one clock from the original commit we're
> still keeping critical) from an email thread:
> > pmu ahb clock
> >
> > Function: Clock to pmu module when hibernation and/or ADP is
> > enabled. Must be greater than or equal to 30 MHz.
> >
> > If the SOC design does not support hibernation/ADP function, only have
> > hclk_otg, this clk can be switched according to the usage of otg.
> > If the SOC design support hibernation/ADP, has two clocks, hclk_otg and
> > pmu_hclk_otg0.
> > Hclk_otg belongs to the closed part of otg logic, which can be switched
> > according to the use of otg.
> >
> > pmu_hclk_otg0 belongs to the always on part.
> >
> > As for whether pmu_hclk_otg0 can be turned off when otg is not in use,
> > we have not tested. IC suggest make pmu_hclk_otg0 always on.
> For the rest of the clocks:
> atclk: No documentation about this clock other than that it goes to
> the CPU. CPU functions fine without it on. Maybe needed for JTAG?
> jtag: Presumably this clock is only needed if you're debugging with
> JTAG. It doesn't seem like it makes sense to waste power for every
> rk3288 user. In any case to do JTAG you'd need private patches to
> adjust the pinctrl the mux the JTAG out anyway.
> pclk_dbg, pclk_core_niu: On veyron Chromebooks we turn these two
> clocks on only during kernel panics in order to access some coresight
> registers. Since nothing in the upstream kernel does this we should
> be able to leave them off safely. Maybe also needed for JTAG?
> hsicphy12m_xin12m: There is no indication of why this clock would need
> to be turned on for boards that don't use HSIC.
> pclk_ddrupctl[0-1], pclk_publ0[0-1]: On veyron Chromebooks we turn
> these 4 clocks on only when doing DDR transitions and they are off
> otherwise. I see no reason why they'd need to be on in the upstream
> kernel which doesn't support DDRFreq.
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <>

applied for 5.2


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-23 12:18    [W:0.056 / U:2.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site