lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Add EDMA0/EDMA1 nodes
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:31 PM Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Baluta
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 5:43 PM
> >
> > i.MX8QXP contains a total of 4 EDMA controllers of which two are primarily
> > for audio components and the other two are for non-audio periperhals.
> >
> > This patch adds the EDMA0/EDMA1 nodes used by audio peripherals.
> >
> > EDMA0 contains channels for:
> > * ASRC0
> > * ESAI0
> > * SPDIF0
> > * SAI0, SAI1, SAI2, SAI3
> >
> > EDMA1 contains channels for:
> > * ASRC1
> > * SAI4, SAI5
> >
> > See chapter Audio DMA Memory Maps (2.2.3) from i.MX8QXP RM [1]
> >
> > This patch is based on the dtsi file initially submitted by Teo Hall in i.MX NXP
> > internal tree.
> >
> > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/IMX8DQXPRM.pdf
> >
> > Cc: Teo Hall <teo.hall@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi | 72
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > index 0cb939861a60..9e959deb2499 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > @@ -182,6 +182,78 @@
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + edma0: dma-controller@591f0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-edma";

Thanks for the comment Aisheng!

>
> Should this be "fsl,imx8qxp-edma"?

Yes, I think that's the more clear approach although in
our internal tree the edma driver uses only the "fsl,imx8qm-edma
compatible.

I will go with your suggestion.


> or
> "fsl,imx8qxp-edma", "fsl,imx8qm-edma"?

One thing that it is not clear for me is why there are places
where we use two compatible strings?

I understand the situation where are two distinct drivers, but is there
any other reason to add multiple compatible strings for a node in dts?

thanks,
Daniel.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-27 09:53    [W:0.053 / U:18.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site