lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/10] MIPS: SGI-IP27 rework
Date
Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> SGI IP27 (Origin/Onyx2) and SGI IP30 (Octane) have a similair
> architecture and share some hardware (ioc3/bridge). To share
> the software parts this patchset reworks SGI IP27 interrupt
> and pci bridge code. By using features Linux gained during the
> many years since SGI IP27 code was integrated this even results
> in code reduction and IMHO cleaner code.
>
> Tests have been done on a two module O200 (4 CPUs) and an
> Origin 2000 (8 CPUs).
>
> My next step in integrating SGI IP30 support is splitting ioc3eth
> into a MFD and subdevice drivers. Prototype is working, but needs
> still more clean ups.
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - replaced HUB_L/HUB_S by __raw_readq/__raw_writeq
> - removed union bridge_ate
> - replaced remaing fields in slice_data by per_cpu data
> - use generic_handle_irq instead of do_IRQ
> - use hierarchy irq domain for stacking bridge and hub interrupt
> - moved __dma_to_phys/__phy_to_dma to mach-ip27/dma-direct.h
> - use dev_to_node() for pcibus_to_node() implementation
>
> Thomas Bogendoerfer (10):
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: get rid of volatile and hubreg_t
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: clean up bridge access and header files
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: use pr_info/pr_emerg and pr_cont to fix output
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: do xtalk scanning later
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: do boot CPU init later
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: rework HUB interrupts
> PCI: call add_bus method also for root bus
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: use generic PCI driver
> genirq/irqdomain: fall back to default domain when creating hierarchy
> domain
> MIPS: SGI-IP27: abstract chipset irq from bridge

I have patches 1-6 applied locally - would you be happy for those to be
pushed to mips-next without 7-10? I know ip27_defconfig still builds but
have no idea whether it still works :)

I don't appear to have received patches 7 or 9 but I see from archives
there'll be a v3 of patch 9 at least.

So I can either apply 1-6 for v5.1 or defer the whole series. Let me
know - I'm happy either way.

Thanks,
Paul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-21 21:50    [W:0.267 / U:6.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site