lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[RFC 0/1] s390/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory has missing symbols
Date
Hi s390 maintainers,

This patch mirrors a similar patch for x86, but it has been untested
because I do not have a mainframe to compile on :)

In 5.4-rc1 the 2 different sha256 implementations for the purgatory resp.
for crypto/sha256_generic.c have been consolidated into 1 single shared
implementation under lib/crypto/sha256.c .

At least on x86 this was causing silent corruption of the purgatory due
to a missing memzero_explicit symbol in the purgatory string.c/.o file.

With the x86 equivalent of this patch applied a x86 build of 5.4-rc1 now
correctly fails:

CHK arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro
ld: arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro: in function `sha256_transform':
sha256.c:(.text+0x1c0c): undefined reference to `memzero_explicit'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile:72:
arch/x86/purgatory/kexec-purgatory.c] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/purgatory] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1650: arch/x86] Error 2

It would be great if the s390 maintainers can test this equivalent patch
on s390.

As for fixing the missing memzero_explicit symbol, we are currently
discussing making memzero_explicit a static inline wrapper of memset
in string.h, so that we do not need to implement it in multiple places.

This discussion is Cc-ed to the generic linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list,
it is happening in the
"[PATCH v2 5.4 regression fix] x86/boot: Provide memzero_explicit" thread.

Regards,

Hans


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-17 16:06    [W:0.032 / U:1.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site