lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2 v6] x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io resource name
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:40 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> + Bjorn.
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 01:44:07PM +0800, lijiang wrote:
> > At present, the upstream kernel does not pass the e820 reserved ranges to the
> > second kernel, which might cause two problems:
> >
> > The first one is the MMCONFIG issue, the PCI MMCONFIG(extended mode) requires
> > the reserved region otherwise it falls back to legacy mode, which might lead to
> > the hot-plug device could not be recognized in kdump kernel.
>
> Well, this still doesn't explain it fully. Let's look at a box:
>
> [ 0.000000] e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x00000000000997ff] usable
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000099800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000e0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x0000000065642fff] usable
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000065643000-0x0000000067fb8fff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000067fb9000-0x00000000689e8fff] ACPI NVS
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000689e9000-0x0000000068bf5fff] ACPI data
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000068bf6000-0x000000006f7fffff] usable
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000006f800000-0x000000008fffffff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fd000000-0x00000000fe7fffff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec00000-0x00000000fec00fff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec80000-0x00000000fed00fff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ff800000-0x00000001007fffff] reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100800000-0x000000603fffffff] usable
>
> this one has 8 reserved regions. Does that mean that we need to pass
> them *all* 8 to the second kernel so that MMCONFIG works?
>
> Or is it only one reserved region which is needed for MMCONFIG?
>
> Bjorn, do you know what the detection logic should be to map the correct
> reserved region (or regions) for MMCONFIG?

MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) space is described in the ACPI MCFG table. The
generic code to read that is in drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c (ignore all
the quirks at the top) and the generic code to use it is
drivers/pci/ecam.c.

Unfortunately x86 doesn't use any of that generic path. It uses the
same MCFG table, but it's parsed in arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c,
and the code there checks to ensure the ECAM regions are reserved
somehow by firmware, e.g., via the e820 table. There's a bunch of
grungy device-dependent code there, too, possibly to work around
firmware defects, or (just as likely) to compensate for Linux defects
that were *attributed* to firmware.

I think you should regard correct MCFG/ECAM usage in the kdump kernel
as a requirement. If you don't have ECAM (a) PCI devices won't work
at all on non-x86 systems that use only ECAM for config access, (b)
you won't be able to access devices on non-0 segments (granted, there
aren't very many of these yet, but there will be more in the future),
and (c) you won't be able to access extended config space (addresses
0x100-0xfff), which means none of the Extended Capabilities will be
available (AER, ACS, ATS, etc).

Bjorn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-20 21:45    [W:0.138 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site