lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2 v6] x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io resource name
From
Date
在 2018年11月18日 19:52, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:25:55AM +0800, lijiang wrote:
>> For the pci mmconfig issue, it should be good enough that the e820 reserved region
>> [mem 0x0000000078000000-0x000000008fffffff] is only passed to the second kernel, but
>> the pci mmconfig region is not the same in another machine.
>
> Yes. And now the question is, *which* reserved regions need to be mapped
> for the second kernel to function properly? How do we figure that out?
>
>> A simple case, hotplug a pci network card and use the ssh/nfs to dump the vmcore.
>> If the pci mmconfig region is not reserved in kdump kernel, the pci hotplug device
>> could not be recognized. So the pci network card won't work.
>
> Yes that's a good example; put *that* example in your commit message.
>
>> Here, there is an example about SME kdump. Maybe it can help to better understand.
>
> You keep pasting that and I've read it already. And you keep repeating
> that the reserved regions need to be mapped in the second kernel and I'm
> asking, how do we determine *which* regions should we pass to the second
> kernel?
>
> If we should pass *all* reserved regions, why?
>
> IOW, I'm looking for the *why* first.
>
> Thx.
>

I guess you have gotten the answer what you want from Dave's reply.

Thank you, Boris. Also thanks for Dave's explanation in detail.

Regards,
Lianbo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-20 05:08    [W:0.071 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site