Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/30] 4.4.57-stable review | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:15:28 -0700 |
| |
On 03/24/2017 05:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > + at91 maintainers > > kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> writes: > >> stable-rc boot: 496 boots: 1 failed, 492 passed with 2 offline, 1 conflict (v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3) >> >> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3/ >> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3/ >> >> Tree: stable-rc >> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y >> Git Describe: v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3 >> Git Commit: bcd1e808ead359a9af8476025d8b8a5349796dcd >> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> Tested: 97 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 31 builds out of 202 >> >> Boot Regressions Detected: >> >> arm: >> >> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: >> at91-sama5d2_xplained: >> lab-free-electrons: new failure (last pass: v4.4.51-27-g2ffd736763bc) > > This one is definitely a new regression. Hopefully the AT91 maintainers > (now Cc'd) can have a closer look. >
6b1d7b6f54c7 would be a candidate for a culprit.
Guenter
> [...] > >> Conflicting Boot Failure Detected: (These likely are not failures as other labs are reporting PASS. Needs review.) >> >> arm: >> >> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: >> at91-sama5d3_xplained: >> lab-baylibre-seattle: PASS >> lab-free-electrons: FAIL > > @Alexandre: Because it's passing in my lab and failing in yours, I'm > guessing this is still the UART overflow issue we've discussed before? > > What's strange is that this defconfig in your lab seems to only be > booting for stable/linux-4.4.y[1] but not mailine or newer stable trees, > so I couldn't check if the problem still exists in mainline. > > Kevin > > [1] https://kernelci.org/boot/at91-sama5d3_xplained/?CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING&lab-free-electrons >
| |