lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Xilinx NWL: Modifying irq chip for legacy interrupts
From
Date
On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> - Few wifi end points which only support legacy interrupts,
> performs hardware reset functionalities after disabling interrupts
> by invoking disable_irq and then re-enable using enable_irq, they
> enable hardware interrupts first and then virtual irq line later.
> - The legacy irq line goes low only after DEASSERT_INTx is
> received.As the legacy irq line is high immediately after hardware
> interrupts are enabled but virq of EP is still in disabled state
> and EP handler is never executed resulting no DEASSERT_INTx.If dummy
> irq chip is used, interrutps are not masked and system is
> hanging with CPU stall.
> - Adding irq chip functions instead of dummy irq chip for legacy
> interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> index c8b5a33..e1809f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -396,10 +396,44 @@ static void nwl_pcie_msi_handler_low(struct irq_desc *desc)
> chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> }
>
> +static void nwl_mask_leg_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(data->irq);
> + struct nwl_pcie *pcie;
> + unsigned int mask = 0;

No need for this initialization. And if the function you're passing that
to takes a u32, why isn't that a u32 too?

> +
> + pcie = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc);
> + mask = 1 << (data->hwirq - 1);
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, ((u32)MSGF_LEG_SR_MASKALL & (~mask)),
> + MSGF_LEG_MASK);

Erm. This looks completely bogus. Let's say I mask INTA:

mask = 1 << 0;
nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, INTD|INTC|INTB, ...);

Now, in a separate context, I decide to mask INTB:

mask = 1 << 1;
nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, INTD|INTC|INTA, ...);

unmasking INTA in the process. Probably not what you intended.

> +
> +}
> +
> +static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(data->irq);
> + struct nwl_pcie *pcie;
> + unsigned int mask = 0;
> +
> + pcie = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc);
> + mask = 1 << (data->hwirq - 1);
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, ((u32)MSGF_LEG_SR_MASKALL | mask),
> + MSGF_LEG_MASK);

Same issue.

> +
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip nwl_leg_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "nwl_pcie:legacy",
> + .irq_enable = nwl_unmask_leg_irq,
> + .irq_disable = nwl_mask_leg_irq,
> + .irq_mask = nwl_mask_leg_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = nwl_unmask_leg_irq,
> +};
> +
> static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> {
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &dummy_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
>
> return 0;
>

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-23 19:38    [W:0.108 / U:3.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site