Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:02:27 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree |
| |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are > > expecting someone else to apply it.
> No it doesn't, you made that up. :)
> I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but
That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do this, probably make one up.
> you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I > mean when I Ack a patch. I do it as an indication that I've reviewed > the patch and I'm happy with it. Most MFD patches that have
Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen this behaviour. Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially on the resends where presumably this has been happening. Not sure why I even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning API. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |