Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 9/9] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation | Date | Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:45:13 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:54:15 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> > > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined > > preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef: > > Damn, I had hoped that would work universally; I tried to avoid the > uglier #if-inside-#ifdef construction. GCC 6 is quite happy wth it. > > But no objections. > > If you want: > Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> > > But here's an alternative. Geert, what do you think of this? > Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
I picked the wrong patch from patchwork, I meant to get https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9139839/ instead, sorry for the mixup. I originally had my own patch in the series and then replaced it with Geert's before sending it out, but got the wrong url.
Arnd
| |