lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/5] mtd: devices: m25p80: add support for mmap read request
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:03:50AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 01:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:39:58AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:

> >> + if (spi_flash_read_supported(spi)) {
> >> + struct spi_flash_read_message msg;
> >> + int ret;

> > Looking at this I can't help but think that spi_flash_read() ought to
> > have the stub in rather than the caller. But given that we're pretty
> > much only ever expecting one user I'm not 100% sure it actually matters.

> Well, my initial patch set passed long list of arguments to
> spi_flash_read(), but Brian suggested to use struct[1] in order to avoid
> unnecessary churn when things need changed in the API.

I don't see what that has to do with my point?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-13 00:01    [W:0.492 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site